Are we all in a “Naive Realism” now?
Physical objects exist as we perceive them and exist independently of us.
God has not yet been observed, so he does not exist…
Time is unequivocally hard and terrible, no longer makes my view impartial,
I have seen more violence, the children from the Balkan war,
also fleeing from helicopters and planes.
Objections to naive realism (by Descartes, among others):
How objects look depends on your point of view and can be an illusion or hallucination…
https://www.boomfilosofie.nl/product/100-7592_Filosofie-van-de-objectieve-geest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phenomenology_of_Spirit
The ambiguity that comes back in my doings, is provided with a “Certificate of Authenticity.”
Take last night; in more than an hour, two will suddenly become three hours!
Don’t ask me how that is possible, apparently, this is agreed work.
All timepieces last, at least most.
It has had and has, again, a use.
The dyer-need is back, so we agree on 2 becomes 3! & call it ”summer-time”
While we know it’s not right, we agree to it.
I see it’s 3 o’clock, so it’s 3 o’clock.
It depends on how you look at it, what perspective, near or far, objectivity and judgment from my reaction to the uncertainty of the “Ambiguity”, everything is open to multiple interpretations.
Reuters Breaking News; “War in Ukraine causes German business morale to collapse...”
Perhaps the focus on business and confidence in the big picture of trade and prosperity.
Look, I’ll show it, from my perspective; see? Hoping we all look with the same eye and come
to the same conclusion: “It’s a Chair!”
Well made by an experienced cabinet maker in a very elegant way, everyone loves to have one, too bad it reminds you of the pain of “such a chair”, when you were just a (clumsy) child.
Do you see the new or “old” chair? It seems difficult in many cases to be objective and not have any doubts or reservations.
We look with our brains and we think with our eyes, to think about it…;
See?
Maybe we have only assumed the possibility that objective knowledge exists.
So more knowledge is more truth, more objective knowledge leads to “the ultimate”
truth and ultimately no more dependencies, knowledge could be gathered with a book.
But since the printing press anno 1450, much has been written, rewritten, and edited as well as burned at the stake or, despite everything, discarded.
Objectivity – Philosophy of Science
https://www.uu.nl/wetfilos/bijsluiter/objectiviteit.html
Subjective idealism
It seems to be Putin’s motto: “Esse est percipi”
= to be is to be perceived. (quote: *Berkeley)
Suppose:
Color without form, form without color, is an absurd theory leading to the conclusion,
that secondary and primary qualities are one: both exist only in the mind of the observer.
In concrete terms: everything only exists within the experience world of the observer,
some things in life cannot be captured in a word.
Yet, in trying to stay close to the perception to obtain the fullest possible
picture of reality, your insight determines what you see and thus experience.
The parallel world of a frustrated Moscow Dwarf…
Objectives have dug themselves into the striving to define the boundaries,
the desperate struggle ignited in all horror.
**Solipsism:
Believing that you are the only form of consciousness, for I do not perceive that other people exist. Too crazy for words, but visibly observed are the many horrors of war, in the blink of an eye.
Dictators must not start doubting themselves, then the paranoia is complete, excess of disaster.
Normally I am against violence, but now like to make the famous exception, with this song:
“If I had a Rocket Launcher”…
Luc van de Steeg / LucFineArt 27-03-2022
Amsterdam/Weesp
**https://www.britannica.com/topic/solipsism